The principle

Most recruitment fees are a flat percentage of placed salary, regardless of how easy or hard the role was to fill. We think that's the wrong model. A role that takes 5 days to shortlist and a role that takes 45 days should not cost the same.

Our pricing is based on search effort — the actual work required to fill the role at the spec presented to us. A role in the green zone (high hireability score, strong candidate pool, competitive salary) requires less search effort, so it carries a lower fee. A role that is genuinely hard to fill — below-market salary, over-filtered spec, scarce candidate pool — requires more work, so the fee is higher.

This is search-effort pricing, and it creates a straightforward incentive: fix the role, pay less.

Standard search
12–15%

Roles with a hireability score below 60. Spec requires meaningful work to optimise before and during the search. Candidate pool is limited at the presented spec.

Hireability score range Below 60
Typical candidate pool 5–15 reachable
Search effort High
Est. time to shortlist 14–28 days

First-time clients: −2% off either option on your first placement. The green-zone search starts at just 7%.

How the score determines the fee

Every role submitted through the Hireability Engine receives a score from 0–100. That score is built from five factors: base market availability, candidate supply in the specific geography, salary relative to the movement point, number of essential skills listed, and interview process length. Each factor has a stated weight and a stated deduction. Nothing is hidden.

The fee bracket is set at the start of the search, based on the agreed spec. If you agree the recommended green-zone changes before we begin, you receive the green-zone rate. If you want to proceed at the original spec, you proceed at the standard rate. There is no mid-search fee adjustment unless the spec materially changes.

What the fee covers

The fee covers a contingency search: GRW runs the search, presents a shortlist, manages the process, and the fee is payable on placement. No upfront retainer is required for standard searches.

Specifically, the fee covers:

  • Passive candidate outreach to GRW's mapped engineer network
  • Market-validated job advertising (using the upgraded spec)
  • Candidate qualification and briefing before any CV is presented
  • Interview scheduling and process management
  • Offer negotiation and notice management
  • A 12-week replacement guarantee on every permanent placement

What this is not

This is not surge pricing. This is not dynamic pricing. The fee is set transparently before the search begins, based on the objective effort required, and confirmed in writing by Bruce. It does not change with market conditions, urgency, or the number of other searches running simultaneously.

The language matters because it reflects the intent. "Dynamic pricing" implies a fee that rises when you're most desperate — that is not what this is. "Search-effort pricing" means: we estimate the work honestly, we set the fee accordingly, and we tell you exactly how to reduce it.

The green zone

A role is in the green zone when its hireability score is 70 or above. At that score, the candidate pool is large enough to give us confidence we can build a quality shortlist within 7–14 days. The fee reflects that confidence.

Getting a role into the green zone typically requires some or all of the following adjustments:

  • Salary raised to the market movement point for the role family and geography
  • Essential skills reduced to those genuinely required on day one
  • Sector requirements widened to include transferable backgrounds
  • Interview process reduced to two stages

These adjustments are identified automatically by the Hireability Engine and confirmed by Bruce before any search begins. None of them means lowering the bar on the engineer — they mean removing the filters that were blocking good engineers from being considered.

Fairer recruitment pricing — what that means in practice

We use the phrase "fairer recruitment pricing" deliberately. Most recruitment fees are set as a fixed percentage of salary, agreed before anyone has analysed whether the role is actually fillable. The employer carries all the risk if the search runs long. GRW's model shifts some of that risk back to the recruiter: we are incentivised to fill the role efficiently, because an inefficient search — one caused by a spec that was never going to fill — earns us the same fee for twice the work.

The result is a straightforward alignment: GRW's interest is in filling good roles quickly. The employer's interest is in filling good roles quickly. The fee model reflects that.

Worked example

A Multi-Skilled Maintenance Engineer role in Glasgow, presented at £42,000 with 9 essential skills, scores 43 on the Hireability Engine. At standard rate (15%), the fee on placement at £42,000 is £6,300.

The same role, presented at £46,000–£48,000 with 5 essentials and a widened sector requirement, scores 74. At green-zone rate (9%), the fee on placement at £47,000 is £4,230. The employer pays approximately £5,000 more in salary over the year — and saves £2,070 on the fee, with a faster shortlist and a reduced risk of the role going unfilled.

That is what "improve the role, reduce the fee" means in practice.

Talk to us

If you want to discuss a specific role before submitting it through the Engine, or if you have a retained search requirement, contact Bruce directly:

Check your role's hireability score

See your score, your candidate pool estimate, and your green-zone recommendations — instantly, for free.

Check my job spec